Separate moderation case status from decisions

docs/guides/moderation.md

@@ -132,18 +132,22 @@ priority and assign it to an eligible administrator or moderator. Filter the cas
 queue by status, priority, or assignment; active cases appear first, ordered by
 priority and most recent update.
 
-Move active cases between **Open**, **In review**, and **Escalated**, recording a
+Use **Change status** to move a case between **Open**, **In progress**, and
-reason for workflow changes. Close a case with one of these outcomes: **Resolved**,
+**Closed**, recording a reason for each transition. Assignment is separate:
-**Dismissed**, **Warning issued**, **Restriction applied**, **No action needed**,
+a case can have an owner at any stage. To resume a closed case, change its status
-**Duplicate**, **Appeal upheld**, or **Appeal denied**. Every decision requires a
+to Open or In progress. Evidence, assessments, actions, and earlier decisions
-reason. Reopen a closed case when new evidence or an appeal needs review; earlier
+remain in its history. Editing case details does not change its status.
-decisions remain in its history. Editing case details does not reopen a case.
+
+Existing closed outcomes are migrated to Closed. Previously escalated cases
+become In progress. Their previous statuses are recorded in history; existing
+decision reasons, action references, assignments, and follow-ups are preserved.
 
 Use **Edit assessment** to keep a concise current summary, list the applicable
 rules, and record a finding for each concern: hate speech, harassment, threats,
 safeguarding, spam, cheating, or another concern. Each finding is **Substantiated**,
 **Inconclusive**, or **Unsubstantiated**, with a short rationale. Findings describe
-the evidence; the case's workflow status and final outcome remain separate.
+the evidence; case status tracks whether work remains. Record the decision and
+its rationale in the assessment summary.
 Every saved assessment retains its author, timestamp, and complete previous
 revision. Assessments can be revised after closure without reopening the case.
 
@@ -174,9 +178,9 @@ external messaging delivery.
 Apply a ban or mute directly from an active case. The case fixes the target game
 and GUID and records the resulting restriction alongside the evidence. The same
 role, scope, and duration limits apply as elsewhere in Moderation. Applying a
-restriction leaves the case active so staff can finish reviewing it. Selecting a
+restriction leaves the case active so staff can finish reviewing it. Changing case status
-closure outcome records a decision; it does not itself send a warning, create a
+records workflow progress; it does not send a warning, create a restriction, or
-restriction, or revoke one. Linked restrictions can be revoked separately with
+revoke one. Linked restrictions can be revoked separately with
 the required permission and reason, including after a case closes. Reopening a
 case also leaves its restrictions in place. Check enforcement coverage after
 applying or revoking a restriction.
@@ -186,9 +190,9 @@ mute already recorded for this player with the case. This preserves the original
 action, author, time, delivery state, and expiry; it does not issue another action
 or extend a restriction. The same action can support more than one related case.
 Linking requires the current case revision and a reason, and appears in its timeline.
-When closing with **Warning issued** or **Restriction applied**, optionally reference
+Linked records show what actually happened, including failed or uncertain delivery.
-one of the linked records. Warning references require a confirmed warning; failed
+They remain visible when a case closes; status changes do not require choosing
-or uncertain delivery remains visible without being presented as a confirmed warning.
+or re-entering an action.
 
 Staff notes are explicitly labeled as notes. In match chat, select up to 100
 messages and choose **Attach to case** to open a case or add them to an existing

src/lib/moderation.ts

@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ export type ModerationActionKind = 'warn' | 'message' | 'kick' | 'announce';
 export type ModerationState =
     'queued' | 'delivered' | 'confirmed' | 'failed' | 'expired' | 'unknown';
 
+/** Legacy decisions retained for historical events and older API clients, never lifecycle states. */
 export const moderationCaseOutcomes = [
     'resolved',
     'dismissed',
@@ -16,12 +17,7 @@ export const moderationCaseOutcomes = [
     'appeal_upheld',
     'appeal_denied'
 ] as const;
-export const moderationCaseStatuses = [
+export const moderationCaseStatuses = ['open', 'in_review', 'closed'] as const;
-    'open',
-    'in_review',
-    'escalated',
-    ...moderationCaseOutcomes
-] as const;
 export type ModerationCaseStatus = (typeof moderationCaseStatuses)[number];
 export type ModerationCasePriority = 'low' | 'normal' | 'high' | 'urgent';
 export const moderationCaseRelations = ['same_incident', 'appeal_of', 'duplicate_of'] as const;
@@ -31,9 +27,13 @@ export const moderationCaseRelationLabels: Record<ModerationCaseRelation, string
     appeal_of: 'Appeal of',
     duplicate_of: 'Duplicate of'
 };
-export const moderationCaseStatusLabels: Record<ModerationCaseStatus, string> = {
+export const moderationCaseStatusLabels: Record<
+    ModerationCaseStatus | (typeof moderationCaseOutcomes)[number] | 'escalated',
+    string
+> = {
     open: 'Open',
-    in_review: 'In review',
+    in_review: 'In progress',
+    closed: 'Closed',
     escalated: 'Escalated',
     resolved: 'Resolved',
     dismissed: 'Dismissed',
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ export const moderationCaseStatusLabels: Record<ModerationCaseStatus, string> =
     appeal_denied: 'Appeal denied'
 };
 export function isModerationCaseOpen(status: ModerationCaseStatus): boolean {
-    return status === 'open' || status === 'in_review' || status === 'escalated';
+    return status === 'open' || status === 'in_review';
 }
 
 export const moderationConcernCategories = [

src/lib/server/db/migrations.ts

@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ import {
     migrateModerationCaseAssessments,
     migrateModerationCaseRelationships,
     migrateModerationCaseFollowups,
-    migrateModerationCaseReferenceIndexes
+    migrateModerationCaseReferenceIndexes,
+    migrateModerationCaseStates
 } from '../moderation/schema.js';
 import type { Migration } from './migration-runner.js';
 
@@ -203,6 +204,12 @@ export const migrations: readonly Migration[] = [
         version: 35,
         name: 'moderation case foreign key reference indexes',
         run: migrateModerationCaseReferenceIndexes
+    },
+    {
+        version: 36,
+        name: 'moderation case lifecycle states',
+        mode: 'foreign-keys-off',
+        run: migrateModerationCaseStates
     }
 ];
 

src/lib/server/moderation/actions.ts

@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ import {
     canRevokeModerationRestriction,
     isModerationCaseOpen,
     moderationCaseOutcomes,
+    moderationCaseStatuses,
     moderationCaseStatusLabels,
     type ModerationCaseStatus,
     type ModerationCasePriority,
@@ -438,13 +439,9 @@ function updateCase(actor: AuthUser, input: Record<string, unknown>, now: string
     const status = input.status === undefined ? row.status : input.status;
     if (
         input.status !== undefined &&
-        status !== 'open' &&
+        !moderationCaseStatuses.includes(status as ModerationCaseStatus)
-        status !== 'in_review' &&
-        status !== 'escalated'
     )
-        throw new AuthError('Choose an active case status, or close the case with an outcome.');
+        throw new AuthError('Choose Open, In progress, or Closed.');
-    if (input.status !== undefined && !isModerationCaseOpen(row.status))
-        throw new AuthError('Use reopen to reactivate a closed case.', 409);
     const reason = textField(input.reason, 'Status change reason', 4000, status === row.status);
     const changes: Record<string, unknown> = {};
     if (title !== row.title) changes.title = { from: row.title, to: title };
@@ -585,6 +582,7 @@ export function mutateModeration(actorId: string, input: Record<string, unknown>
             notifyCase(actor.id, row.id, 'evidence', now);
             return { id: row.id };
         }
+        // Older clients may still record decisions, but every closure now stores only Closed.
         if (input.op === 'resolve-case') {
             const row = caseRow(input.id);
             if (row.revision !== input.revision || !isModerationCaseOpen(row.status))
@@ -620,7 +618,7 @@ export function mutateModeration(actorId: string, input: Record<string, unknown>
                 .prepare(
                     'UPDATE moderation_cases SET status=?,updated_at=?,revision=revision+1 WHERE id=?'
                 )
-                .run(outcome, now, row.id);
+                .run('closed', now, row.id);
             moderationEvent(
                 actor,
                 `case.${outcome}`,

src/lib/server/moderation/overview.ts

@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ export function moderationOverview(actorId: string, query: ModerationQuery): Mod
         if (query.view === 'cases') {
             if (query.caseStatus === 'active' || query.caseStatus === 'closed') {
                 where.push(
-                    `p.status ${query.caseStatus === 'closed' ? 'NOT ' : ''}IN ('open','in_review','escalated')`
+                    `p.status ${query.caseStatus === 'closed' ? 'NOT ' : ''}IN ('open','in_review')`
                 );
             } else if (query.caseStatus) {
                 where.push('p.status=?');
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ export function moderationOverview(actorId: string, query: ModerationQuery): Mod
             result.cases = rows<Omit<ModerationCase, 'evidence'>>(
                 'moderation_cases',
                 'p.id,p.game,p.guid,p.title,p.status,p.priority,p.assignee_id AS assigneeId,(SELECT username FROM auth_users WHERE id=p.assignee_id) AS assignee,p.actor,p.created_at AS createdAt,p.updated_at AS updatedAt,p.revision,p.review_at AS reviewAt,p.review_reason AS reviewReason,p.review_sanction_id AS reviewSanctionId',
-                "CASE WHEN p.review_at<=? THEN 0 ELSE 1 END,CASE WHEN p.review_at<=? THEN p.review_at END,CASE WHEN p.status IN ('open','in_review','escalated') THEN 0 ELSE 1 END,CASE p.priority WHEN 'urgent' THEN 0 WHEN 'high' THEN 1 WHEN 'normal' THEN 2 ELSE 3 END,p.updated_at DESC,p.id",
+                "CASE WHEN p.review_at<=? THEN 0 ELSE 1 END,CASE WHEN p.review_at<=? THEN p.review_at END,CASE WHEN p.status IN ('open','in_review') THEN 0 ELSE 1 END,CASE p.priority WHEN 'urgent' THEN 0 WHEN 'high' THEN 1 WHEN 'normal' THEN 2 ELSE 3 END,p.updated_at DESC,p.id",
                 [now, now]
             ).map((c) => ({
                 ...c,

src/lib/server/moderation/schema.ts

@@ -235,3 +235,42 @@ export function migrateModerationCaseReferenceIndexes(handle: Database.Database)
             ON moderation_case_notifications(case_id);
     `);
 }
+
+/** Normalize lifecycle state while retaining every prior decision and child record. */
+export function migrateModerationCaseStates(handle: Database.Database): void {
+    if (handle.pragma('foreign_keys', { simple: true }))
+        throw new Error('The case status migration requires foreign keys to be disabled');
+    const objects = handle
+        .prepare(
+            `SELECT sql FROM sqlite_master
+        WHERE tbl_name='moderation_cases' AND type IN ('index','trigger') AND sql IS NOT NULL`
+        )
+        .all() as { sql: string }[];
+    // Capture old statuses even for imported cases without a corresponding decision event.
+    handle.exec(`INSERT INTO moderation_events(game,guid,actor,action,subject_id,detail,created_at)
+        SELECT game,guid,'Maxis','case.status_migrated',id,
+            json_object('from',status,'to',CASE WHEN status='escalated' THEN 'in_review' ELSE 'closed' END),
+            strftime('%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%fZ','now') FROM moderation_cases
+        WHERE status NOT IN ('open','in_review');
+        CREATE TABLE moderation_cases_state (
+            id TEXT PRIMARY KEY, game TEXT NOT NULL, guid TEXT NOT NULL, title TEXT NOT NULL,
+            status TEXT NOT NULL CHECK(status IN ('open','in_review','closed')),
+            actor_id TEXT NOT NULL, actor TEXT NOT NULL,
+            created_at TEXT NOT NULL, updated_at TEXT NOT NULL, revision INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 1,
+            priority TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT 'normal' CHECK(priority IN ('low','normal','high','urgent')),
+            assignee_id TEXT REFERENCES auth_users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+            review_at TEXT, review_reason TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
+            review_sanction_id TEXT REFERENCES moderation_sanctions(id) ON DELETE SET NULL
+        );
+        INSERT INTO moderation_cases_state
+            SELECT id,game,guid,title,
+                CASE WHEN status IN ('open','in_review') THEN status
+                    WHEN status='escalated' THEN 'in_review' ELSE 'closed' END,
+                actor_id,actor,created_at,updated_at,
+                revision+CASE WHEN status IN ('open','in_review') THEN 0 ELSE 1 END,
+                priority,assignee_id,review_at,review_reason,review_sanction_id FROM moderation_cases;
+        DROP TABLE moderation_cases;
+        ALTER TABLE moderation_cases_state RENAME TO moderation_cases;
+    `);
+    for (const object of objects) handle.exec(object.sql);
+}

src/lib/ui/components/moderation/ModerationDialog.svelte

@@ -1,17 +1,14 @@
 <script lang="ts">
     import { untrack } from 'svelte';
     import {
-        isModerationCaseOpen,
+        moderationCaseStatuses,
-        moderationCaseOutcomes,
         moderationCaseStatusLabels,
         type ModerationCoverage,
         type ModerationGame,
         type ModerationScope,
-        type ModerationCase,
+        type ModerationCase
-        type ModerationCaseAction
     } from '$lib/moderation.js';
-    import { moderationActionName, moderationGameName } from '$ui/moderation.js';
+    import { moderationGameName } from '$ui/moderation.js';
-    import { timeFormat } from '$ui/stores/time-zone.js';
     import { serverTitle } from '$ui/server-labels.js';
     import { confirmAction } from '$ui/confirm.js';
     import Dialog from '../primitives/Dialog.svelte';
@@ -29,7 +26,6 @@
         admin,
         seed = {},
         assignees = [],
-        linkedActions = [],
         onsubmitted
     }: {
         open?: boolean;
@@ -40,14 +36,12 @@
             | 'note'
             | 'revoke'
             | 'case-note'
-            | 'resolve'
+            | 'case-status'
-            | 'reopen'
             | 'edit-case'
             | 'evidence';
         coverage: ModerationCoverage[];
         admin: boolean;
         assignees?: { id: string; username: string }[];
-        linkedActions?: ModerationCaseAction[];
         seed?: {
             game?: ModerationGame;
             guid?: string;
@@ -81,26 +75,10 @@
     let status = $state(untrack(() => seed.status ?? 'open'));
     let matchId = $state<number | undefined>(untrack(() => seed.matchId));
     let message = $state(untrack(() => seed.message ?? ''));
+    const statusUnchanged = $derived(mode === 'case-status' && status === seed.status);
     const lockedTarget = $derived(mode === 'restriction' && !!seed.caseId);
-    const stateChanged = $derived(mode === 'edit-case' && status !== seed.status);
     const reasonBytes = $derived(new TextEncoder().encode(reason.trim()).length);
     const gameText = $derived(mode === 'restriction' || mode === 'action');
-    let resolution = $state('resolved');
-    let actionReference = $state('');
-    const referenceActions = $derived(
-        linkedActions.filter((item) =>
-            resolution === 'warning_issued'
-                ? item.type === 'action' && item.kind === 'warn' && item.state === 'confirmed'
-                : resolution === 'restriction_applied' && item.type === 'restriction'
-        )
-    );
-    const referencedAction = $derived(
-        referenceActions.find((item) => `${item.type}:${item.id}` === actionReference)
-    );
-    $effect(() => {
-        void resolution;
-        actionReference = '';
-    });
     let busy = $state(false);
     let error = $state('');
     let uncertain = $state(false);
@@ -113,8 +91,7 @@
             note: 'Add private note',
             revoke: 'Revoke restriction',
             'case-note': 'Add case note',
-            resolve: 'Review case',
+            'case-status': 'Change status',
-            reopen: 'Reopen case',
             'edit-case': 'Edit case',
             evidence: 'Attach archived evidence'
         }[mode]
@@ -184,13 +161,6 @@
         if (mode === 'note') return { op: 'note', game, guid: guid.trim(), text: note.trim() };
         if (mode === 'case-note')
             return { op: 'case-note', id: seed.id, revision: seed.revision, text: note.trim() };
-        if (mode === 'reopen')
-            return {
-                op: 'reopen-case',
-                id: seed.id,
-                revision: seed.revision,
-                reason: reason.trim()
-            };
         if (mode === 'edit-case')
             return {
                 op: 'update-case',
@@ -201,7 +171,6 @@
                 ...(assigneeId !== (seed.assigneeId ?? '')
                     ? { assigneeId: assigneeId || null }
                     : {}),
-                ...(isModerationCaseOpen(status) ? { status } : {}),
                 reason: reason.trim()
             };
         if (mode === 'evidence')
@@ -219,14 +188,11 @@
                 reason: reason.trim()
             };
         return {
-            op: 'resolve-case',
+            op: 'update-case',
             id: seed.id,
             revision: seed.revision,
-            status: resolution,
+            status,
-            reason: reason.trim(),
+            reason: reason.trim()
-            ...(referencedAction
-                ? { actionReference: { type: referencedAction.type, id: referencedAction.id } }
-                : {})
         };
     }
 
@@ -392,7 +358,7 @@
                 </p>{/if}
             {#if lockedTarget}<p class="hint">
                     This restriction will be linked to the case and its recorded player identity.
-                    Applying it does not close the case; record the outcome when your review is
+                    Applying it does not close the case; change its status when your work is
                     complete.
                 </p>{/if}
             {#if mode === 'case' || mode === 'edit-case'}
@@ -447,26 +413,8 @@
                         /></Field
                     >
                 </div>
-                {#if isModerationCaseOpen(seed.status ?? 'open')}
+                <Field label="Change reason" hint="Optional note about these edits.">
-                    <Field label="Workflow status"
+                    <Textarea bind:value={reason} rows={3} />
-                        ><Select
-                            bind:value={status}
-                            options={[
-                                { value: 'open', label: moderationCaseStatusLabels.open },
-                                { value: 'in_review', label: moderationCaseStatusLabels.in_review },
-                                { value: 'escalated', label: moderationCaseStatusLabels.escalated }
-                            ]}
-                        /></Field
-                    >
-                {:else}<p class="hint">
-                        The recorded outcome is preserved. Reopen the case to resume review.
-                    </p>{/if}
-                <Field
-                    label="Change reason"
-                    required={stateChanged}
-                    hint="Required when changing workflow status."
-                >
-                    <Textarea bind:value={reason} required={stateChanged} rows={3} />
                 </Field>
             {/if}
             {#if mode === 'evidence'}
@@ -481,55 +429,29 @@
                     ><Textarea bind:value={message} required rows={4} maxlength={4096} /></Field
                 >
             {/if}
-            {#if mode === 'resolve'}<Field label="Outcome"
+            {#if mode === 'case-status'}
+                <Field label="Status"
                     ><Select
-                        bind:value={resolution}
+                        bind:value={status}
-                        options={moderationCaseOutcomes.map((value) => ({
+                        options={moderationCaseStatuses.map((value) => ({
                             value,
                             label: moderationCaseStatusLabels[value]
                         }))}
                     /></Field
-                >{/if}
-            {#if mode === 'resolve'}<p class="hint">
-                    This records the decision and closes the case. Apply or revoke restrictions
-                    separately, and send warnings through Live action. Choosing an outcome does not
-                    change enforcement or send a warning.
-                </p>{/if}
-            {#if mode === 'resolve' && ['warning_issued', 'restriction_applied'].includes(resolution)}
-                <Field
-                    label="Supporting action"
-                    hint="Optional. Reference an existing linked action as the basis for this outcome."
                 >
-                    <Select
+                <p class="hint">
-                        bind:value={actionReference}
+                    Track whether this case is open, in progress, or closed. Findings and recorded
-                        options={[
+                    actions stay in the case history.
-                            { value: '', label: 'No action reference' },
+                </p>
-                            ...referenceActions.map((item) => ({
-                                value: `${item.type}:${item.id}`,
-                                label: `${moderationActionName(item.kind)} · ${$timeFormat.dateTime(item.createdAt)} · ${item.reason}`
-                            }))
-                        ]}
-                    />
-                </Field>
-                {#if !referenceActions.length}<p class="hint">
-                        {resolution === 'warning_issued'
-                            ? 'No confirmed warnings are linked to this case.'
-                            : 'No restrictions are linked to this case.'} Use “Link existing action” on
-                        the case to add a prior action.
-                    </p>{/if}
             {/if}
-            {#if mode === 'reopen'}<p class="hint">
+            {#if ['restriction', 'action', 'revoke', 'case-status'].includes(mode)}
-                    Reopening returns the case to Open and preserves its evidence, restrictions, and
-                    earlier decisions.
-                </p>{/if}
-            {#if ['restriction', 'action', 'revoke', 'resolve', 'reopen'].includes(mode)}
                 <Field
                     label={mode === 'action' && ['message', 'announce'].includes(action)
                         ? 'Message'
                         : mode === 'restriction' || mode === 'action'
                           ? 'Player-visible reason'
-                          : mode === 'reopen'
+                          : mode === 'case-status'
-                            ? 'Reopening reason'
+                            ? 'Change reason'
                             : 'Review reason'}
                     hint={gameText
                         ? `${reasonBytes} / 240 bytes. Some characters use more than one byte.`
@@ -561,7 +483,7 @@
         <div class="actions">
             <Button disabled={busy} onclick={() => (open = false)}>Cancel</Button><Button
                 type="submit"
-                disabled={!uncertain && actionUnavailable}
+                disabled={!uncertain && (actionUnavailable || statusUnchanged)}
                 variant={mode === 'restriction' || mode === 'revoke' ? 'danger' : 'primary'}
                 loading={busy}>{uncertain ? 'Retry same request' : 'Save'}</Button
             >

src/lib/ui/moderation.ts

@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ export const moderationActionLabels: Record<string, string> = {
     'case.appeal_denied': 'Appeal denied',
     'case.reopened': 'Case reopened',
     'case.updated': 'Case updated',
+    'case.status_migrated': 'Case status migrated',
     'case.assessed': 'Assessment revised',
     'case.review_scheduled': 'Follow-up updated',
     'schedule-case-review': 'Follow-up updated',
@@ -137,8 +138,10 @@ export function moderationEventDetail(detail: string, action: string): string {
                 if (typeof value.reason === 'string') changes.push(value.reason);
                 return changes.join('\n') || detail;
             }
+            if (action === 'case.status_migrated')
+                return `Previous status: ${display(value.from, true)} → ${display(value.to, true)}. Earlier decisions and actions are preserved.`;
             if (action === 'case.reopened' && typeof value.reason === 'string')
-                return `Previous outcome: ${display(value.from, true)}\n${value.reason}`;
+                return `Previous status: ${display(value.from, true)}\n${value.reason}`;
             if (
                 action === 'case.evidence_attached' &&
                 typeof value.count === 'number' &&

src/lib/ui/status.ts

@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ const states: Record<string, [string, StatusTone]> = {
     'moderation-active': ['Active', 'warning'],
     'moderation-revoked': ['Revoked', 'neutral'],
     'moderation-open': ['Open', 'info'],
-    'moderation-in_review': ['In review', 'info'],
+    'moderation-in_review': ['In progress', 'info'],
+    'moderation-closed': ['Closed', 'neutral'],
     'moderation-escalated': ['Escalated', 'warning'],
     'moderation-resolved': ['Resolved', 'online'],
     'moderation-dismissed': ['Dismissed', 'neutral'],

src/routes/moderation/+page.svelte

@@ -388,7 +388,6 @@
                     options={[
                         { value: '', label: 'All statuses' },
                         { value: 'active', label: 'Active cases' },
-                        { value: 'closed', label: 'Closed cases' },
                         ...moderationCaseStatuses.map((status) => ({
                             value: status,
                             label: moderationCaseStatusLabels[status]

src/routes/moderation/cases/[id]/+page.svelte

@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@
     function submitted() {
         notice =
             mode === 'restriction'
-                ? 'Restriction saved and linked to this case. Review enforcement coverage below. The case remains open until you record an outcome.'
+                ? 'Restriction saved and linked to this case. Review enforcement coverage below. The case remains open until you change its status.'
                 : mode === 'revoke'
                   ? 'Revocation saved. Servers apply it when they receive the latest policy.'
                   : 'Case updated. The change is recorded in the timeline.';
@@ -226,12 +226,9 @@
             />
             <Button onclick={() => refresh()} loading={refreshing} disabled={busy}>Refresh</Button>
             {#if permitted}
-                {#if active}<Button variant="primary" onclick={() => openDialog('resolve')}
+                <Button variant="primary" onclick={() => openDialog('case-status')}
-                        >Review case</Button
+                    >Change status</Button
-                    >
+                >
-                {:else}<Button variant="primary" onclick={() => openDialog('reopen')}
-                        >Reopen case</Button
-                    >{/if}
             {/if}
         {/snippet}
     </SectionHeader>
@@ -568,7 +565,7 @@
                             </li>{/each}
                     </ol>{:else}<p class="hint">No restrictions are linked to this case.</p>{/if}
                 <p class="hint">
-                    Applying or revoking a restriction does not change the case outcome.
+                    Applying or revoking a restriction does not change the case status.
                 </p>
             </section>
 
@@ -604,7 +601,6 @@
             {admin}
             coverage={report.coverage}
             assignees={report.assignees}
-            linkedActions={report.linkedActions}
             onsubmitted={submitted}
         />{/key}{/if}
 

tests/client/moderation-case-page.test.ts

@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ it('preserves original evidence context, linked restrictions, and staff history
     expect(document.querySelector('a[href^="/matches/17"]')).not.toBeNull();
     for (const label of [
         'Edit case',
-        'Review case',
+        'Change status',
         'Reopen case',
         'Restrict player',
         'Revoke restriction',
@@ -251,12 +251,12 @@ it('locks case restrictions to the recorded identity and revision without closin
         durationMinutes: 60
     });
     expect(fetch.mock.calls[1][0]).toBe('/api/moderation/cases/case-1');
-    expect(button('Review case')).toBeDefined();
+    expect(button('Change status')).toBeDefined();
 });
 
-it('records specific outcomes and reopens a closed case with a reason and the latest revision', async () => {
+it('closes and reopens through lifecycle status with a reason and the latest revision', async () => {
     const closed = detail();
-    closed.case.status = 'warning_issued';
+    closed.case.status = 'closed';
     closed.case.revision = 5;
     const reopened = detail();
     reopened.case.status = 'open';
@@ -269,37 +269,34 @@ it('records specific outcomes and reopens a closed case with a reason and the la
         .mockResolvedValueOnce(response(reopened));
     vi.stubGlobal('fetch', fetch);
     show();
-    button('Review case').click();
+    button('Change status').click();
     await tick();
-    expect([...field<HTMLSelectElement>('Outcome').options].map((option) => option.value)).toEqual([
+    expect([...field<HTMLSelectElement>('Status').options].map((option) => option.value)).toEqual([
-        'resolved',
+        'open',
-        'dismissed',
+        'in_review',
-        'warning_issued',
+        'closed'
-        'restriction_applied',
-        'no_action',
-        'duplicate',
-        'appeal_upheld',
-        'appeal_denied'
     ]);
-    select('Outcome', 'warning_issued');
+    select('Status', 'closed');
-    enter(field('Review reason'), 'Warning was sufficient');
+    enter(field('Change reason'), 'Warning was sufficient');
     submit();
-    await vi.waitFor(() => expect(button('Reopen case')).toBeDefined());
+    await vi.waitFor(() => expect(document.querySelector('dialog')?.open).not.toBe(true));
     expect(JSON.parse(fetch.mock.calls[0][1].body)).toMatchObject({
-        op: 'resolve-case',
+        op: 'update-case',
         id: 'case-1',
         revision: 4,
-        status: 'warning_issued',
+        status: 'closed',
         reason: 'Warning was sufficient'
     });
     expect(button('Restrict player')).toBeUndefined();
-    button('Reopen case').click();
+    button('Change status').click();
     await tick();
-    enter(field('Reopening reason'), 'New evidence received');
+    select('Status', 'open');
+    enter(field('Change reason'), 'New evidence received');
     submit();
-    await vi.waitFor(() => expect(button('Review case')).toBeDefined());
+    await vi.waitFor(() => expect(fetch).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(4));
     expect(JSON.parse(fetch.mock.calls[2][1].body)).toMatchObject({
-        op: 'reopen-case',
+        op: 'update-case',
+        status: 'open',
         id: 'case-1',
         revision: 5,
         reason: 'New evidence received'
@@ -307,7 +304,7 @@ it('records specific outcomes and reopens a closed case with a reason and the la
     expect(document.body.textContent).toContain('Check the earlier warning.');
 });
 
-it('edits priority, assignment, and review workflow with a required transition reason', async () => {
+it('edits priority and assignment separately from lifecycle status', async () => {
     const fetch = vi
         .fn()
         .mockResolvedValueOnce(response({ ok: true, id: 'case-1' }))
@@ -319,8 +316,8 @@ it('edits priority, assignment, and review workflow with a required transition r
     enter(field('Case title'), 'Urgent report');
     select('Priority', 'urgent');
     select('Assigned to', 'staff-2');
-    select('Workflow status', 'escalated');
+    expect(document.querySelector('dialog')?.textContent).not.toContain('Workflow status');
-    expect(field<HTMLTextAreaElement>('Change reason').required).toBe(true);
+    expect(field<HTMLTextAreaElement>('Change reason').required).toBe(false);
     enter(field('Change reason'), 'Needs administrator review');
     submit();
     await vi.waitFor(() => expect(fetch).toHaveBeenCalled());
@@ -331,14 +328,13 @@ it('edits priority, assignment, and review workflow with a required transition r
         title: 'Urgent report',
         priority: 'urgent',
         assigneeId: 'staff-2',
-        status: 'escalated',
         reason: 'Needs administrator review'
     });
 });
 
 it('preserves an unavailable assignee when editing metadata on a closed case', async () => {
     const initial = detail();
-    initial.case.status = 'no_action';
+    initial.case.status = 'closed';
     initial.case.assigneeId = 'disabled-staff';
     initial.case.assignee = 'Former staff';
     const fetch = vi
@@ -431,13 +427,11 @@ it('links a prior mute with its recorded outcome without issuing another restric
     expect(button('Link existing action').disabled).toBe(true);
 });
 
-it.each([
+it.each(['in_review', 'closed'] as const)(
-    ['warning_issued', 'action:warning-1', 'action', 'warning-1'],
+    'changes status to %s without replacing findings or issuing an action',
-    ['restriction_applied', 'restriction:restriction-1', 'restriction', 'restriction-1']
+    async (status) => {
-] as const)(
-    'references a linked action when recording %s',
-    async (outcome, selection, type, id) => {
         const initial = detail();
+        initial.case.status = 'open';
         initial.linkedActions = [
             {
                 id: 'warning-1',
@@ -476,31 +470,34 @@ it.each([
             .mockResolvedValue(response(initial));
         vi.stubGlobal('fetch', fetch);
         show(initial);
-        button('Review case').click();
+        button('Change status').click();
         await tick();
-        select('Outcome', outcome);
+        expect(button('Save').disabled).toBe(true);
-        const options = [...field<HTMLSelectElement>('Supporting action').options].map(
+        select('Status', status);
-            (option) => option.value
+        await tick();
-        );
+        expect(button('Save').disabled).toBe(false);
-        expect(options).toEqual(['', selection]);
+        expect(document.querySelector('dialog')?.textContent).not.toContain('Supporting action');
-        select('Supporting action', selection);
+        enter(field('Change reason'), 'Reviewed the recorded action');
-        enter(field('Review reason'), 'Reviewed the recorded action');
         submit();
         await vi.waitFor(() => expect(fetch).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2));
         expect(JSON.parse(fetch.mock.calls[0][1].body)).toMatchObject({
-            op: 'resolve-case',
+            op: 'update-case',
             id: 'case-1',
             revision: 4,
-            status: outcome,
+            status
-            actionReference: { type, id }
         });
+        expect(JSON.parse(fetch.mock.calls[0][1].body)).not.toHaveProperty('actionReference');
+        expect(document.querySelector('[aria-labelledby="actions-title"]')?.textContent).toContain(
+            'Confirmed warning'
+        );
     }
 );
 
 it('retains a conflicted review and lets staff refresh before making another decision', async () => {
     const updated = detail();
     updated.case.revision = 8;
-    updated.case.status = 'escalated';
+    updated.case.title = 'Updated case after concurrent edit';
+    updated.case.status = 'in_review';
     const fetch = vi
         .fn()
         .mockResolvedValueOnce(
@@ -509,28 +506,29 @@ it('retains a conflicted review and lets staff refresh before making another dec
         .mockResolvedValue(response(updated));
     vi.stubGlobal('fetch', fetch);
     show();
-    button('Review case').click();
+    button('Change status').click();
     await tick();
-    select('Outcome', 'appeal_denied');
+    select('Status', 'closed');
-    enter(field('Review reason'), 'Evidence supports the restriction');
+    enter(field('Change reason'), 'Evidence supports the restriction');
     submit();
     await vi.waitFor(() =>
         expect(document.querySelector('dialog [role="alert"]')?.textContent).toContain(
             'This case changed.'
         )
     );
-    expect(field<HTMLSelectElement>('Outcome').value).toBe('appeal_denied');
+    expect(field<HTMLSelectElement>('Status').value).toBe('closed');
     expect(document.querySelector('dialog')!.open).toBe(true);
     expect(button('Reopen case')).toBeUndefined();
     button('Cancel').click();
     await tick();
     button('Refresh').click();
     await vi.waitFor(() =>
-        expect(document.querySelector('.case-summary')?.textContent).toContain('Escalated')
+        expect(document.querySelector('h1')?.textContent).toBe('Updated case after concurrent edit')
     );
-    button('Review case').click();
+    button('Change status').click();
     await tick();
-    enter(field('Review reason'), 'Reviewed new context');
+    select('Status', 'closed');
+    enter(field('Change reason'), 'Reviewed new context');
     submit();
     await vi.waitFor(() => expect(fetch.mock.calls.length).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(3));
     expect(JSON.parse(fetch.mock.calls[2][1].body).revision).toBe(8);

tests/client/moderation-follow-up.test.ts

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ const item: ModerationCase = {
     game: 't5',
     guid: '123',
     title: 'Chat review',
-    status: 'resolved',
+    status: 'closed',
     priority: 'normal',
     assignee: null,
     assigneeId: null,

tests/client/moderation-page.test.ts

@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ it('links case records to workspaces and preserves case filters while paging', (
                 actor: 'Moderator',
                 createdAt: '2026-10-16T12:00:00Z'
             },
-            status: 'escalated',
+            status: 'in_review',
             priority: 'high',
             assigneeId: 'staff-1',
             assignee: 'Moderator',
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ it('links case records to workspaces and preserves case filters while paging', (
     expect(document.querySelector('a[href="/moderation/cases/case-1"]')?.textContent).toBe(
         'Chat investigation'
     );
-    expect(document.querySelector('#moderation-results')?.textContent).toContain('Escalated');
+    expect(document.querySelector('#moderation-results')?.textContent).toContain('In progress');
     expect(document.querySelector('#moderation-results')?.textContent).toContain('Moderator');
     expect(document.querySelector('#moderation-results')?.textContent).toContain(
         'The threat remains ambiguous.'

tests/unit/moderation-assessments.test.ts

@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ it('preserves current and historical assessments with case revisions, including
     };
     await mutate(assess(id, 3, updated), 'admin');
     const data = await detail(id, 'super_viewer');
-    expect(data.case).toMatchObject({ revision: 4, status: 'no_action' });
+    expect(data.case).toMatchObject({ revision: 4, status: 'closed' });
     expect(data.assessment).toEqual({
         ...updated,
         revision: 4,
@@ -253,8 +253,8 @@ it('adds assessment storage to an existing database without altering case record
             )
             .run(clock, clock);
         const before = legacy.prepare('SELECT * FROM moderation_cases').all();
-        runMigrations(legacy, migrations);
+        runMigrations(legacy, migrations.slice(0, 32));
-        runMigrations(legacy, migrations);
+        runMigrations(legacy, migrations.slice(0, 32));
         expect(legacy.prepare('SELECT * FROM moderation_cases').all()).toMatchObject(before);
         const insert = legacy.prepare(
             'INSERT INTO moderation_case_assessments VALUES(?,?,?,?,?,?)'

tests/unit/moderation-case-actions.test.ts

@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ it('links historical live actions to closed cases and exposes their real deliver
     const before = enforcement();
     await mutate(link(id, 2, 'action', warningId));
     const data = await detail(id, 'super_viewer');
-    expect(data.case).toMatchObject({ status: 'no_action', revision: 3 });
+    expect(data.case).toMatchObject({ status: 'closed', revision: 3 });
     expect(data.linkedActions).toMatchObject([{ id: warningId, kind: 'warn', state: 'confirmed' }]);
     expect(data.availableActions).toMatchObject([{ id: failedId, state: 'failed' }]);
     expect(data.events.map((event) => event.action)).toContain('action.confirmed');
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ it('requires a linked confirmed warning for a cited warning outcome and preserve
     const before = enforcement();
     await mutate(resolve(5, 'action', confirmed));
     const data = await detail(id);
-    expect(data.case).toMatchObject({ status: 'warning_issued', revision: 6 });
+    expect(data.case).toMatchObject({ status: 'closed', revision: 6 });
     expect(JSON.parse(data.events[0].detail)).toEqual({
         reason: 'Decision after evidence review',
         actionReference: { type: 'action', id: confirmed }
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ it('allows a historical expired restriction created from the original case to su
         reason: 'Earlier mute addressed the incident',
         actionReference: { type: 'restriction', id: sanction.id }
     });
-    expect((await detail(id)).case.status).toBe('restriction_applied');
+    expect((await detail(id)).case.status).toBe('closed');
     expect(enforcement()).toEqual(before);
 });
 

tests/unit/moderation-case-overview.test.ts

@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ it('filters case queues by workflow, priority and ownership while prioritizing a
     for (const [title, priority, status, owner] of [
         ['Normal report', 'normal', 'open', null],
         ['Urgent review', 'urgent', 'in_review', 'first'],
-        ['High escalation', 'high', 'escalated', 'second'],
+        ['High escalation', 'high', 'in_review', 'second'],
-        ['Closed urgent appeal', 'urgent', 'appeal_upheld', 'first']
+        ['Closed urgent appeal', 'urgent', 'closed', 'first']
     ]) {
         const { id } = mutateModeration('first', {
             op: 'create-case',
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ it('filters case queues by workflow, priority and ownership while prioritizing a
     expect(read().cases.map((item) => item.id)).toEqual([ids[1], ids[2], ids[0], ids[3]]);
     expect(read('caseStatus=active').total).toBe(3);
     expect(read('caseStatus=closed').cases.map((item) => item.id)).toEqual([ids[3]]);
-    expect(read('caseStatus=escalated&priority=high').cases.map((item) => item.id)).toEqual([
+    expect(read('caseStatus=in_review&priority=high').cases.map((item) => item.id)).toEqual([
         ids[2]
     ]);
     expect(read('assignedTo=me').cases.map((item) => item.id)).toEqual([ids[1], ids[3]]);

tests/unit/moderation-case-relationships.test.ts

@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ it('enforces case existence, staff access, revisions, self-link rejection and su
         reason: 'Review complete'
     });
     await mutate(link(a.id, 2, b.id));
-    expect((await detail(a.id)).case).toMatchObject({ status: 'no_action', revision: 3 });
+    expect((await detail(a.id)).case).toMatchObject({ status: 'closed', revision: 3 });
     await expect(detail(a.id, 'viewer')).rejects.toMatchObject({ status: 403 });
 });
 

tests/unit/moderation-case-state.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
+import Database from 'better-sqlite3';
+import { randomUUID } from 'node:crypto';
+import { afterEach, beforeEach, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest';
+import { moderationCaseOutcomes, moderationCaseStatuses } from '../../src/lib/moderation.js';
+import { newFixture, type Fixture } from '../helpers/fixture.js';
+
+let fixture: Fixture;
+beforeEach(async () => {
+    vi.resetModules();
+    fixture = await newFixture([]);
+});
+afterEach(async () => fixture.cleanup());
+
+it('migrates every legacy state while preserving assignments, decisions, evidence, actions and relationships', async () => {
+    const { migrations } = await import('../../src/lib/server/db/migrations.js');
+    const { runMigrations } = await import('../../src/lib/server/db/migration-runner.js');
+    const handle = new Database(':memory:');
+    handle.pragma('foreign_keys = ON');
+    try {
+        runMigrations(handle, migrations.slice(0, 35));
+        handle.exec(`INSERT INTO auth_users(id,username,display_name,password_hash,role,created_at,updated_at)
+            VALUES('staff','staff','Staff','unused','moderator',0,0)`);
+        const statuses = ['open', 'in_review', 'escalated', ...moderationCaseOutcomes];
+        for (const status of statuses) {
+            handle
+                .prepare(
+                    `INSERT INTO moderation_cases(id,game,guid,title,status,actor_id,actor,created_at,updated_at,revision,assignee_id,review_at)
+                VALUES(?,'t5','123','Existing case',?,'staff','Staff','2026-10-17','2026-10-17',7,'staff','2026-11-01')`
+                )
+                .run(status, status);
+        }
+        handle.exec(`
+            INSERT INTO moderation_events(game,guid,actor,action,subject_id,detail,created_at)
+                VALUES('t5','123','Staff','case.warning_issued','warning_issued','Original decision','2026-10-17');
+            INSERT INTO moderation_evidence VALUES('e','warning_issued','Original excerpt','Archived chat','{"entry":"unchanged"}','staff','Staff','2026-10-17');
+            INSERT INTO moderation_sanctions(id,game,guid,kind,scope,reason,note,actor_id,actor,created_at,case_id)
+                VALUES('s','t5','123','mute','game','Original action','','staff','Staff','2026-10-17','warning_issued');
+            UPDATE moderation_cases SET review_sanction_id='s' WHERE id='warning_issued';
+            INSERT INTO moderation_case_action_links VALUES('warning_issued','restriction','s','Staff','2026-10-17');
+            INSERT INTO moderation_case_relationships VALUES('r','open','warning_issued','same_incident','staff','Staff','2026-10-17',NULL);
+            INSERT INTO moderation_case_assessments VALUES('warning_issued',6,'{"summary":"Existing finding"}','staff','Staff','2026-10-17');
+            INSERT INTO moderation_case_notifications(user_id,case_id,kind,created_at) VALUES('staff','warning_issued','evidence','2026-10-17');
+        `);
+        const children = [
+            'moderation_evidence',
+            'moderation_sanctions',
+            'moderation_case_action_links',
+            'moderation_case_relationships',
+            'moderation_case_assessments',
+            'moderation_case_notifications'
+        ];
+        const before = children.map((table) => handle.prepare(`SELECT * FROM ${table}`).all());
+        runMigrations(handle, migrations);
+        runMigrations(handle, migrations);
+        expect(children.map((table) => handle.prepare(`SELECT * FROM ${table}`).all())).toEqual(
+            before
+        );
+        for (const old of statuses) {
+            const expected =
+                old === 'open'
+                    ? 'open'
+                    : ['in_review', 'escalated'].includes(old)
+                      ? 'in_review'
+                      : 'closed';
+            expect(
+                handle
+                    .prepare(
+                        'SELECT status,revision,assignee_id,review_at FROM moderation_cases WHERE id=?'
+                    )
+                    .get(old)
+            ).toEqual({
+                status: expected,
+                revision: old === expected ? 7 : 8,
+                assignee_id: 'staff',
+                review_at: '2026-11-01'
+            });
+        }
+        const events = handle
+            .prepare("SELECT detail FROM moderation_events WHERE action='case.status_migrated'")
+            .all() as { detail: string }[];
+        expect(events.map((event) => JSON.parse(event.detail).from).sort()).toEqual(
+            ['escalated', ...moderationCaseOutcomes].sort()
+        );
+        expect(
+            handle
+                .prepare("SELECT detail FROM moderation_events WHERE action='case.warning_issued'")
+                .get()
+        ).toEqual({ detail: 'Original decision' });
+        expect(() =>
+            handle.exec("UPDATE moderation_cases SET status='warning_issued' WHERE id='open'")
+        ).toThrow('CHECK');
+        expect(handle.pragma('foreign_key_check')).toEqual([]);
+    } finally {
+        handle.close();
+    }
+});
+
+it('changes lifecycle independently of ownership, findings and enforcement with revision and retry protection', async () => {
+    const { db } = await import('../../src/lib/server/db/index.js');
+    const { mutateModeration } = await import('../../src/lib/server/moderation/actions.js');
+    const { moderationCaseDetail } = await import('../../src/lib/server/moderation/cases.js');
+    const handle = db();
+    for (const role of ['moderator', 'super_viewer'])
+        handle
+            .prepare(
+                `INSERT INTO auth_users(id,username,display_name,password_hash,role,created_at,updated_at)
+        VALUES(?,?,?,'unused',?,0,0)`
+            )
+            .run(role, role, role, role);
+    const mutate = (input: Record<string, unknown>, actor = 'moderator') =>
+        mutateModeration(actor, { idempotencyKey: randomUUID(), ...input });
+    const { id } = mutate({
+        op: 'create-case',
+        game: 't5',
+        guid: '123',
+        title: 'Reported conduct',
+        assigneeId: 'moderator'
+    });
+    mutate({
+        op: 'assess-case',
+        id,
+        revision: 1,
+        summary: 'Ambiguous context',
+        rules: [],
+        findings: [{ category: 'threats', finding: 'inconclusive', detail: 'Need more context' }]
+    });
+    const original = moderationCaseDetail('moderator', id);
+    let revision = 2;
+    for (const status of ['in_review', 'closed', 'open', 'closed', 'in_review']) {
+        const request = {
+            op: 'update-case',
+            id,
+            revision,
+            status,
+            reason: 'Workflow changed',
+            idempotencyKey: randomUUID()
+        };
+        expect(() => mutate({ ...request, reason: '' })).toThrow('Status change reason');
+        expect(() => mutate({ ...request, revision: revision - 1 })).toThrow('changed');
+        expect(() => mutate(request, 'super_viewer')).toThrow('Moderation access');
+        mutate(request);
+        mutate(request);
+        revision++;
+        const data = moderationCaseDetail('moderator', id);
+        expect(data.case).toMatchObject({ status, revision, assigneeId: 'moderator' });
+        expect(data.assessmentHistory).toEqual(original.assessmentHistory);
+        expect(data.case.evidence).toEqual(original.case.evidence);
+        expect(data.sanctions).toEqual(original.sanctions);
+        expect(data.events[0]).toMatchObject({ action: 'case.updated' });
+    }
+    for (const status of [...moderationCaseOutcomes, 'assigned', 'escalated'])
+        expect(() =>
+            mutate({ op: 'update-case', id, revision, status, reason: 'Invalid state' })
+        ).toThrow('Choose Open');
+    expect(moderationCaseStatuses).toEqual(['open', 'in_review', 'closed']);
+    expect(handle.prepare('SELECT COUNT(*) AS n FROM moderation_actions').get()).toEqual({ n: 0 });
+});

tests/unit/moderation-cases.test.ts

@@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ it('upgrades legacy cases without changing evidence, events, requests, or restri
                 .all()
         ).toEqual(
             ['dismissed', 'open', 'resolved'].map((status) => ({
-                status,
+                status: status === 'open' ? 'open' : 'closed',
-                revision: 7,
+                revision: status === 'open' ? 7 : 8,
                 priority: 'normal',
                 assignee_id: null
             }))
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ it('upgrades legacy cases without changing evidence, events, requests, or restri
                 .get('{"original":true}')
         ).toEqual({ count: 3 });
         expect(legacy.prepare('SELECT COUNT(*) AS count FROM moderation_events').get()).toEqual({
-            count: 3
+            count: 5
         });
         expect(legacy.prepare('SELECT result FROM moderation_requests').get()).toEqual({
             result: '{"ok":true,"id":"open"}'
@@ -245,12 +245,12 @@ it('audits title, ownership, priority and active state updates with optimistic r
         id,
         revision: 3,
         assigneeId: null,
-        status: 'escalated',
+        status: 'open',
         reason: 'Needs administrator review'
     });
     expect((await detail(id)).case).toMatchObject({
         revision: 4,
-        status: 'escalated',
+        status: 'open',
         assigneeId: null
     });
     await expect(
@@ -267,9 +267,9 @@ it('supports every outcome and reopening while preserving each prior decision',
         );
         await mutate({ op: 'resolve-case', id, revision, status, reason: `Decision ${status}` });
         revision++;
-        expect((await detail(id)).case.status).toBe(status);
+        expect((await detail(id)).case.status).toBe('closed');
         await expect(mutate({ op: 'update-case', id, revision, status: 'open' })).rejects.toThrow(
-            'Use reopen'
+            'Status change reason'
         );
         await expect(
             mutate({ op: 'reopen-case', id, revision: revision - 1, reason: 'Old version' })

tests/unit/moderation-followups.test.ts

@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ it('prioritizes overdue closed cases and recalculates due and scheduled queues u
         closed.id,
         upcoming.id
     ]);
-    expect((await overview()).cases[0].status).toBe('no_action');
+    expect((await overview()).cases[0].status).toBe('closed');
     await mutate(schedule(closed.id, 3, null));
     expect((await overview('creator', 'review=due')).cases.map((item) => item.id)).toEqual([
         upcoming.id

tests/unit/ui-moderation.test.ts

@@ -95,14 +95,14 @@ it('presents case decisions and ownership changes as readable history while pres
             'case.updated'
         )
     ).toBe(
-        'Title: Report → Appeal review\nAssigned to: Unassigned → Moderator\nStatus: Open → In review\nReviewing additional evidence'
+        'Title: Report → Appeal review\nAssigned to: Unassigned → Moderator\nStatus: Open → In progress\nReviewing additional evidence'
     );
     expect(
         moderationEventDetail(
             JSON.stringify({ from: 'appeal_denied', reason: 'New evidence' }),
             'case.reopened'
         )
-    ).toBe('Previous outcome: Appeal denied\nNew evidence');
+    ).toBe('Previous status: Appeal denied\nNew evidence');
     expect(moderationEventDetail('Decision with {unusual text}', 'case.resolved')).toBe(
         'Decision with {unusual text}'
     );
@@ -110,3 +110,14 @@ it('presents case decisions and ownership changes as readable history while pres
         moderationEventDetail(JSON.stringify({ count: 2, matchId: 42 }), 'case.evidence_attached')
     ).toBe('2 archived chat entries attached from match #42.');
 });
+
+it('explains migrated status without hiding the historical decision', () => {
+    expect(
+        moderationEventDetail(
+            JSON.stringify({ from: 'warning_issued', to: 'closed' }),
+            'case.status_migrated'
+        )
+    ).toBe(
+        'Previous status: Warning issued → Closed. Earlier decisions and actions are preserved.'
+    );
+});