Add structured moderation assessments with revision history

This commit is contained in:
2026-10-17 19:47:28 -04:00
parent aca728b557
commit 428aefdf24
18 changed files with 1182 additions and 2 deletions
+214
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,214 @@
import { afterEach, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest';
import { flushSync, mount, tick, unmount } from 'svelte';
import { fromStore, writable } from 'svelte/store';
import CaseAssessment from '../../src/lib/ui/components/moderation/CaseAssessment.svelte';
import type { ModerationCaseAssessment } from '../../src/lib/moderation.js';
let component: ReturnType<typeof mount> | undefined;
afterEach(async () => {
if (component) await unmount(component);
component = undefined;
document.body.replaceChildren();
vi.unstubAllGlobals();
});
const current: ModerationCaseAssessment = {
revision: 4,
summary: 'Slur documented; threatening intent unclear.',
rules: ['Rule 2: Respect other players'],
findings: [
{
category: 'hate_speech',
finding: 'substantiated',
detail: 'The preserved message contains a slur.'
},
{
category: 'threats',
finding: 'inconclusive',
detail: 'The reply could refer to gameplay.'
}
],
actor: 'Moderator One',
createdAt: '2026-10-17T10:00:00Z'
};
function show(
assessment: ModerationCaseAssessment | null = null,
permitted = true,
history: ModerationCaseAssessment[] = []
) {
const props = writable({ revision: 4, assessment });
const state = fromStore(props);
const saved = vi.fn();
component = mount(CaseAssessment, {
target: document.body,
props: {
caseId: 'case-1',
get revision() {
return state.current.revision;
},
get assessment() {
return state.current.assessment;
},
history,
permitted,
onsubmitted: saved
}
});
flushSync();
return {
saved,
update(revision: number, next = assessment) {
props.set({ revision, assessment: next });
flushSync();
}
};
}
const button = (label: string) =>
[...document.querySelectorAll('button')].find((node) => node.textContent?.trim() === label)!;
function field<T extends HTMLTextAreaElement | HTMLSelectElement>(label: string): T {
const node = [...document.querySelectorAll('dialog label')].find(
(node) => node.textContent?.replace('*', '').trim() === label
)!;
return document.querySelector(`[aria-labelledby="${node.id}"]`)! as T;
}
function enter(label: string, value: string) {
const node = field<HTMLTextAreaElement>(label);
node.value = value;
node.dispatchEvent(new Event('input', { bubbles: true }));
flushSync();
}
function select(label: string, value: string) {
const node = field<HTMLSelectElement>(label);
const query = node.querySelector.bind(node);
node.querySelector = ((selector: string) =>
selector === ':checked'
? (node.selectedOptions[0] ?? null)
: query(selector)) as typeof node.querySelector;
node.value = value;
node.dispatchEvent(new Event('change', { bubbles: true }));
flushSync();
}
const response = (value: unknown, status = 200) => new Response(JSON.stringify(value), { status });
function complete() {
enter('Current summary', 'Preserved evidence supports a safeguarding review.');
enter('Applicable rules', ' Rule 4: Safeguarding\n\nRule 2: Respect ');
select('Concern 1', 'safeguarding');
select('Finding 1', 'inconclusive');
enter('Explanation 1', 'The surrounding messages establish age but intent remains unclear.');
}
it('creates structured findings and separate rule references with one concern per category', async () => {
const fetch = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(response({ ok: true, id: 'case-1' }));
vi.stubGlobal('fetch', fetch);
const { saved } = show();
expect(document.body.textContent).toContain('Not assessed');
button('Assess case').click();
await tick();
complete();
button('Add finding').click();
flushSync();
expect(
[...field<HTMLSelectElement>('Concern 2').options].find(
(option) => option.value === 'safeguarding'
)?.disabled
).toBe(true);
select('Concern 2', 'threats');
select('Finding 2', 'unsubstantiated');
enter('Explanation 2', 'No threat is present in the preserved exchange.');
button('Save assessment').click();
await vi.waitFor(() => expect(saved).toHaveBeenCalledOnce());
expect(JSON.parse(fetch.mock.calls[0][1].body)).toEqual({
op: 'assess-case',
id: 'case-1',
revision: 4,
summary: 'Preserved evidence supports a safeguarding review.',
rules: ['Rule 4: Safeguarding', 'Rule 2: Respect'],
findings: [
{
category: 'safeguarding',
finding: 'inconclusive',
detail: 'The surrounding messages establish age but intent remains unclear.'
},
{
category: 'threats',
finding: 'unsubstantiated',
detail: 'No threat is present in the preserved exchange.'
}
],
idempotencyKey: expect.any(String)
});
});
it('shows current findings and preserves prior assessments for read-only viewers', () => {
const previous = {
...current,
revision: 2,
summary: 'Initial concern awaiting full context.',
actor: 'Moderator Two'
};
show(current, false, [current, previous]);
expect(document.body.textContent).toContain(current.summary);
expect(document.body.textContent).toContain('Substantiated');
expect(document.body.textContent).toContain('Inconclusive');
expect(document.querySelector('details summary')?.textContent).toBe('Previous assessments (1)');
expect(document.querySelector('details')?.textContent).toContain(previous.summary);
expect(document.querySelector('details')?.textContent).toContain('Moderator Two');
expect(button('Edit assessment')).toBeUndefined();
expect(document.querySelector('dialog')).toBeNull();
});
it('retains a conflicted assessment and uses the refreshed revision after reopening', async () => {
const fetch = vi
.fn()
.mockResolvedValueOnce(
response({ error: 'This case changed. Reload it before making another change.' }, 409)
)
.mockResolvedValue(response({ ok: true, id: 'case-1' }));
vi.stubGlobal('fetch', fetch);
const { update, saved } = show(current);
button('Edit assessment').click();
await tick();
expect(field<HTMLTextAreaElement>('Current summary').value).toBe(current.summary);
enter('Current summary', 'Revised conclusion after review.');
button('Save assessment').click();
await vi.waitFor(() =>
expect(document.querySelector('[role="alert"]')?.textContent).toContain(
'This case changed.'
)
);
expect(field<HTMLTextAreaElement>('Current summary').value).toBe(
'Revised conclusion after review.'
);
expect(saved).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
button('Cancel').click();
await tick();
update(9);
button('Edit assessment').click();
await tick();
enter('Current summary', 'Reviewed against the refreshed case.');
document.querySelector<HTMLButtonElement>('[aria-label="Remove finding 2"]')!.click();
flushSync();
button('Save assessment').click();
await vi.waitFor(() => expect(saved).toHaveBeenCalledOnce());
expect(JSON.parse(fetch.mock.calls[1][1].body)).toMatchObject({
revision: 9,
findings: [current.findings[0]]
});
});
it('retries an uncertain assessment as the exact same request', async () => {
const fetch = vi
.fn()
.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error('Connection lost'))
.mockResolvedValue(response({ ok: true, id: 'case-1' }));
vi.stubGlobal('fetch', fetch);
const { saved } = show();
button('Assess case').click();
await tick();
complete();
button('Save assessment').click();
await vi.waitFor(() => expect(button('Retry same request')).toBeDefined());
expect(document.querySelector('dialog fieldset')?.hasAttribute('disabled')).toBe(true);
button('Retry same request').click();
await vi.waitFor(() => expect(saved).toHaveBeenCalledOnce());
expect(fetch.mock.calls[1][1].body).toBe(fetch.mock.calls[0][1].body);
});